Uncategorized

“Quantum-safe” has become a popular label on security product pages. Here’s what to actually verify before taking the claim at face value.

The industry has done this before — MD5, SHA-1, early TLS versions. What those transitions actually teach about doing this one well.

An exposure assessment is more than a list of weak algorithms. Here’s what turns a discovery report into something a business can actually act on.

What used to be a purely technical detail is increasingly something boards, auditors and regulators expect an organisation to be able to produce on request.

Most security leaders are now aware of quantum risk. Far fewer have translated that awareness into an actual inventory, assessment or plan. Here’s why that gap persists.

TLS 1.3 is a genuine security improvement over its predecessors. It is not, by itself, an answer to quantum risk. Here’s why the two get conflated.

You don’t need a maths degree to understand why quantum computers threaten RSA and ECC specifically, and why AES is a different story. Here’s the accessible version.

A vulnerability scanner and a cryptographic discovery tool ask fundamentally different questions, even when they look at overlapping infrastructure.

Manual certificate issuance and renewal is the single most common bottleneck in cryptographic migration programmes. Here’s why, and what automating it actually involves.

A quick, practical walkthrough of what actually changes in a TLS handshake when post-quantum and hybrid key exchange are introduced.